Alert: website impersonating Global Ledger detected
Learn more
Skip to content

Web3 Banking Symposium 2026: Key Insights for Financial Institutions

Blockchain, crypto, and Web3 for traditional banking — what financial institutions need to know 
Yulia Murat

Yulia Murat

Head of Regulatory Affairs

April 06, 2026 9 min read

What changed this year at the Web3 Banking Symposium, taking place on March 2, 2026, in Zurich? The room was full of bankers. Nobody found that unusual. That alone says something about where crypto stands today in traditional finance.

Below you will find the key insights from the Web3 Banking Symposium 2026, shared by Yulia Murat, Head of Regulatory Affairs at Global Ledger, and Hanna Khrystianovych, Head of Operations at Global Ledger, on the current stage of crypto across the financial sector. 

Key Takeaways
  • Crypto has reached the acceptance stage on the innovation curve — the question for banks is no longer whether, but how to participate.
  • The discussion around crypto in traditional finance is shifting away from the “asset class debate” toward viewing it as financial infrastructure.
  • Interoperability and legal finality remain the two most critical unresolved challenges for institutional adoption of blockchain-based systems.
  • Tokenised deposits are frequently discussed as a potential entry point for banks into blockchain-based financial infrastructure, though adoption remains limited.

 

Regulation and Structure Shaping Crypto Adoption by Banks

Yulia Murat, Head of Regulatory Affairs at Global Ledger, focused on the structural questions shaping institutional adoption — from cross-border payment infrastructure to the evolving role of stablecoins and wholesale CBDCs. Here are the main observations.

Cross-Border Payments Still Rely on Domestic Infrastructure

A fundamental challenge in cross-border payments is that existing financial infrastructure was designed primarily for domestic settlement, not international transfers. As a result, many cross-border payments rely on coordination between domestic systems rather than true cross-border asset movement.

What’s more, tokenised payment systems still often depend on existing central bank settlement infrastructure, particularly for the final cash leg of transactions. This highlights ongoing structural questions around how digital money integrates with existing financial market infrastructure.

However, changes in this direction are already underway: emerging initiatives are exploring ways to improve efficiency while maintaining central bank sovereignty, jurisdictional control, and data privacy.

Key insight: Cross-border payments are evolving, but still depend on how well new systems integrate with existing infrastructure. 

The Industry Is Shifting from Interoperability to Composability

The industry is increasingly discussing composability rather than interoperability. The focus is shifting toward building systems that can natively integrate and interact with multiple networks, ledgers, and financial infrastructures.

This layered architecture may enable financial institutions to connect multiple payment and settlement systems more seamlessly.

Key insight: Composability is the new design standard. Institutions building for it from the start can have a structural advantage. 

Legal Finality and Fragmentation Create Structural Challenges

Legal finality of transactions remains a central concern for banks adopting blockchain-based financial infrastructure. At the same time, reliability and predictable settlement outcomes remain critical requirements for financial institutions and payment service providers.

Meanwhile, multiple initiatives are emerging simultaneously across the financial ecosystem — bank-led, infrastructure-led, and central bank initiatives. This raises questions about how different infrastructures will connect and operate together, and highlights the importance of designing systems with composability in mind from the outset.

Key insight: Until legal finality is resolved and fragmentation is addressed by design, large-scale institutional adoption will remain limited. 

Banks Face Obstacles in Digital Asset Adoption

Many financial institutions are increasingly moving beyond the question of whether digital assets are relevant, toward considering how they should participate in the ecosystem. For banks, one practical requirement is secure access to public blockchain infrastructure, rather than speculative exposure to crypto assets.

Against this backdrop, several entry points into blockchain-based financial infrastructure are being explored, each at a different stage of maturity:

  • Tokenised deposits are frequently discussed as a potential entry point for banks into blockchain-based financial infrastructure, though adoption remains limited. 

  • Stablecoins currently represent a more mature segment of digital money, particularly in areas such as cross-border payments and treasury management. You can see a similar pattern across other industry events, including Lugano’s Plan ₿ Forum and CV Summit Zurich. 

  • Wholesale central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are being explored as a potential complement to tokenised deposits. However, the commercial viability and clear operational use cases for these instruments are still evolving. 

Key insight: Banks are exploring multiple paths into digital assets, each with a different level of readiness. 

Programmable Money Enables New Payment Models

Blockchain infrastructure enables programmable forms of money, which could support new financial services and more automated payment processes. This shifts how payments are designed — from static transactions to logic-driven flows embedded directly into financial operations.

One emerging area of interest is machine-to-machine payments, where systems execute transactions without direct human involvement. As these use cases develop, they point toward a more automated financial environment where payments can be executed and settled as part of broader system interactions.

Key insight: Programmability expands how payments can be initiated and executed, opening the door to more automated and system-driven financial interactions. 

Regulation Shapes the Path of Digital Money Adoption

As adoption of digital assets grows, regulatory questions are becoming central to how this market develops:

  • Policymakers are evaluating whether stablecoins should be allowed to offer interest, raising questions about competition with traditional bank deposits. 

  • Regulators continue to balance innovation, financial stability, and the role of banks within emerging digital financial systems. For a practical overview of current requirements, see the VASP Regulatory Compliance Checklist 2026. 

Within this environment, banks are expected to play a key role in enabling large-scale adoption of tokenised financial infrastructure. 

“Institutions that explore digital financial technologies early may be better positioned as new market structures develop.”
Yulia Murat
Yulia Murat, Head of Regulatory Affairs at Global Ledger

From Acceptance to Infrastructure: Crypto's Place in Traditional Finance

Hanna Khristianovich, Head of Operations at Global Ledger, shared her perspective on the adoption of crypto within the traditional financial sector. Her observations below include adoption signals, regulatory direction, and the broader shift around crypto in banking.

Crypto Regulatory Map Is Diverging

Regulatory direction differs by region. The US and UK are moving toward regulatory simplification, while Europe remains more complex, with Switzerland positioned somewhere in between. Switzerland maintains a broadly pro-crypto regulatory environment, although stablecoin regulation is still evolving.

Switzerland is one of the leaders in crypto-enabled banking

 ~20 ~15 ~30% 
Swiss banks offer crypto services
US banks offer crypto services
Swiss retail population has access to crypto

Key insight: Although steps are still being taken, Switzerland is one of the most illustrative examples of what the balance between crypto and traditional finance might look like today. 

Crypto Reached the Acceptance Stage

Just a few years ago it was unusual to see banks at crypto events, or to organise crypto discussions specifically for a traditional financial audience. That has changed. Crypto appears to have reached the “Acceptance stage” on the innovation curve.

The discussion around crypto in traditional finance has also changed. It is shifting away from the “asset class debate” toward viewing it as financial infrastructure.


“This is not an asset class debate, this is the rewrite of infrastructure.”
Hanna
Hanna Khrystianovych, Head of Operations, Global Ledger
Key insight: Crypto is becoming part of financial infrastructure. The real challenge now is making that infrastructure trustworthy and compliant. 

Scalability Shifts Beyond Technology

Scalability in crypto is increasingly seen as a business model challenge rather than a purely technical one. As infrastructure matures, the real pressure shifts to whether business models, workflows, processes, and financial systems can keep pace. This is already visible in how traditional players like SWIFT approach the topic.

SWIFT positions itself as a financial messaging provider, with about 50% of messages related to financial statements and settlement processes. Today, around 75% of SWIFT messages reach the recipient within about 10 minutes.

At the same time, SWIFT is exploring blockchain-based ledger infrastructure, aiming to introduce new blockchain rails that remain interoperable with existing payment rails. The first target use case is wholesale cross-border payments, where institutional adoption has already begun. The goal is not just speed, but always-on availability — described at the event as a shift “from email-style messaging to WhatsApp-like messaging”.

 

“Blockchain is not a product, but an operating system.”
Hanna
Hanna Khrystianovych, Head of Operations, Global Ledger
Key insight: Interoperability remains a major challenge — not only between blockchains and layers, but also between crypto infrastructure and traditional systems such as SWIFT. 

Conclusion

The Web3 Banking Symposium 2026 showed a clear shift in how traditional finance sees blockchain. The question is no longer whether it matters, but how to work with it in practice.

For financial institutions, this means making decisions earlier — around infrastructure, compliance, and how to operate in a regulatory environment that is still evolving. These are no longer future questions, but part of today’s operational reality.

To support this shift toward safer crypto in traditional finance, Global Ledger helps financial institutions understand risk, assess counterparties, and navigate blockchain-based transactions with more confidence — from cross-border payments to new forms of digital assets.

 

FAQ 

What is the Web3 Banking Symposium?

The Web3 Banking Symposium is an industry event held in Zurich, where banks, regulators, and crypto companies discuss how blockchain and digital assets are shaping the future of financial services. 

Are banks going to adopt crypto?

Banks are already moving toward crypto adoption, shifting from whether to participate to how to integrate it into their infrastructure and services.

What is the purpose of crypto regulation?

Crypto regulation aims to ensure financial stability, reduce risk, and provide clear rules for how digital assets can be used within the financial system.

How are stablecoins used by financial institutions?

Stablecoins are often used for cross-border payments and treasury operations, acting as a bridge between crypto and traditional finance.